6 Eylül 2016 Salı

Dynamo Study 2 - Facade Rationalization

This facade consists of the combination of a rectangle and a 8 sided star. This computational logic allows to study it in algorithmic environment.

Grasshoper Script

Facade Rationalization process have been done at Rhinoceros- Grasshopper. Optimization process forge ahead between facade consultant and designer.
I wanted to follow up all process in BIM environment step by step. I am looking for the differences between CAD & BIM environment in Rationalization process. Is BIM has an advantage during rationalization process for computational cases?


Initial Geometry

Main Horizontal Alignments


Surface normal disjointedness

Curve selection rule

Facade Trigon and Tetragon Paneling

It is certain that this topic has extended research area. I keep reading and continue to experiment about it.  I will create new titles based on them...
Thank you for reading.
Cheers,



5 Eylül 2016 Pazartesi

Dyno Tool - Something Inteesting is Happening


Take a look to Dyno, It looks exciting.

"Dyno provides versatile and simple possibilities for making work with Dynamo workspaces faster."
http://tools.prorubim.com/en/dyno/

User Manual
http://tools.prorubim.com/en/dyno/docs/



Dynamo Study 1 - Coordination between ARCH&MEP

Architects are still modeling MEP equipment in their own architectural Revit model, even though it is a BIM project in order to be coordinated with MEP.  This method can also be argued to being not feasible, but was one I used for coordination in a Residential Building Project.

We have been modelling all ceiling equipment to manage ceiling layout on Architectural BIM models, like lighting, sprinklers, detectors..etc. Essentially Mechanic Engineers modelling these equipment into BIM model, because of that reason we had to check all equipment if they exist or are in the right location to be able to provide coordinated layout after every model share.


Following this, I decided to compare the equipment location between Architectural and MEP models with using Dynamo.




The first problem was architectural and MEP model's mismatches, Architect separating tower blocks and podium floors into different model files, MEP separating different mechanical systems (HVAC, Security System, Water Supply System, Fire Alarm...) into different model files. The reason, I had to link all the models into one model with using "Get elements From Linked Model" node , than catch the family centre points.


Ensuring tolerance despite small slip.



Second problem was the "shared coordinate data" which were different in all the BIM models. Accordingly, I manually transferred all points in each model to the same coordination point. 

Transfer the points to the Same Coordinate System



After transferring elements manually this problem solved in Dynamo Forum. There is a topic which is solved by Dimitar_Venkov It is explaining how to transfer linked elements to the "shared coordinate" location.
https://forum.dynamobim.com/t/querying-a-linked-model-and-creating-from-it/1052/12?u=jesper_wallaert



The link below will take you to the dynamo forum where I was helped to match close points in the model. I matched the points as you can see below in the excel sheet. If there was a point less than 1000mm away, dynamo wrote it down on the side column, if there was no point it left the side column empty. After that I could determine which location had the problem.

These clashes can be provided with this dynamo study and coordination has become easier.


Thank you for reading.


Cheers,

12 Ağustos 2016 Cuma

Dynamo User Group Istanbul


Dynamo User Group Istanbul Sessions started.
Sessions leading by Mehmet Polat Diker and orginizing by Zeynep Bacınoğlu and Cansu Yeni.
You can watch several dynamo practises or you can present your own practises in these sessions.
If you are interested you can sign up to dynamo,istanbul group wtih link below.
http://rhb.com.tr/dynamo/


The first session was completed with more than 70 participants. Thank you for presenters; 
Enes Kaan Karabay parametrically.com
and Mehmet Polat Diker redhotbim.com




The second session was completed with Mehmet Polat Diker's T-spline presentation and Bold Architecture's experience sharing made by Burcu Acet and Mehmet Akçan . Thank you for presenters; 
Bold Mimarlık http://www.boldmimarlik.com/
Mehmet Polat Diker redhotbim.com


The third session was completed with Barış Canpolat presentation. He present Dynamo scripts which are using by mechanical engineers. Thank you for this inspirational presentation.


The forth session was completed with my presentation, i present MEP&ARCH coordination study and VakıfBank Facade Rationalization study.



The fifth session was completed with Ümit Balaban presentation. He present Dynamo experience which are using by mechanical engineers. 


29 Haziran 2016 Çarşamba

Aethereal Space - MSTAS 2016 Workshop


Light Painting with Robotic Arm

I participated in a 2 days workshop, in Bilgi University Department of  Architecture. The aim was to create "Aethereal Space" with using Robotic Arm. It was really exciting experience for me.
We created definisions in grasshopper for create it with light. There was only one rule; the created line should be continues, because the light could not be closed while creating the geometry.
After creating the continous line in grasshopper, we could preview the simulation of robotic arm movements with KUKaprc add-in. 


KUKAprc has pretty a very friendly user interface. You can preview errors of the model, while in operation and see what is causing the problem. After  finalising the definition, the data can be exported as ".src" format to transfer to the robotic arm.

Thank you to all team for such a successful work.

Participants;
Efe Gözen
Burcu Biçer Saner
Ayşegül Özarmut
Cansu Yeni














15 Ocak 2016 Cuma